Koretz, D. (1997). The assessment of students with disabilities in Kentucky (CSE Report No. 431). University of California, Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California, Los Angeles. https://cresst.org/publications/cresst-publication-2803/

Report
Koretz, D. (1997). The assessment of students with disabilities in Kentucky (CSE Report No. 431). University of California, Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California, Los Angeles. https://cresst.org/publications/cresst-publication-2803/

Tags

Clarify directions; Cueing; Dictated response; Dictated response (scribe); Elementary; Emotional/Behavioral disability; High school; Intellectual disabilities; K-12; Learning disabilities; Math; Middle school; Multiple accommodations; Multiple ages; Multiple content; Oral delivery; Oral delivery, live/in-person; Paraphrasing; Reading; Science; Social studies; Speech/Language disability; Technological aid; U.S. context

URL

https://cresst.org/publications/cresst-publication-2803/

Summary

Accommodation

The most frequently used accommodations were grouped into four major classes: dictation, oral reading, rephrasing, cueing. Data were examined on these accommodations singly and in combination along with actual test performance.

Participants

Performance data were analyzed from students in grades 4 and 8 from across the Commonwealth of Kentucky (U.S.) who completed tests in the statewide assessment program. This extant data set contained 142,844 students' scores, of whom 11,159 were students with disabilities.

Dependent Variable

Two major dependent variables were used: the frequency with which an accommodation was used and the performance on the statewide test in reading, math, social studies, and science when the accommodation was used.

Findings

In grades 4 and 8, accommodations were frequently used (66% and 45%, respectively). When students with mild intellectual disabilities in grade 4 were provided dictation with other accommodations, they performed much closer to the mean of the general education population, and above the mean in science. Similar results occurred for students with learning disabilities. For students in grade 8, the results were similar but less dramatic. Using multiple regression to obtain an optimal estimate of each single accommodation and then comparing predicted performance with the accommodation to predicted performance without the accommodation, dictation appeared to have the strongest effect across the subject areas of math, reading, and science, as well as across grade levels. This influence was significantly stronger than that attained for paraphrasing and oral presentation, respectively. (See also Koretz, 1997; Koretz & Hamilton, 2000)