AA-AAAS Bibliography: Search
Search Filters
Search Results
Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Wakeman, S., Trela, K., & Baker, J. N. (2006). Aligning instruction with academic content standards: Finding the link. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(4), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100404
Browder, D. M., Trela, K., & Jimenez, B. A. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301
Browder, D. M., Trela, K., Courtade, G. R., Jimenez, B. A., Knight, V., & Flowers, C. (2012). Teaching mathematics and science standards to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 46(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910369942
Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., & Flowers, C. (2006). Assessment of progress in the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Theory Into Practice, 45(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4503_7
Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., & Flowers, C. (2009). Alignment of alternate assessments with state standards. In W. D. Schafer & R. W. Lissitz (Eds.), Alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards: Policy, practice, and potential (pp. 61–91). Paul H. Brookes.
Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Flowers, C., Rickelman, R., Pugalee, D., & Karvonen, M. (2007). Creating access to the general curriculum with links to grade-level content for students with significant cognitive disabilities: An explication of the concept. The Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410010101
Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S., & Flowers, C. (2009). Which came first – the curriculum or the assessment? In W. D. Schafer & R. W. Lissitz (Eds.), Alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards: Policy, practice, and potential (pp. 329–333). Paul H. Brookes.
Browder, D. M., Wood, L., Thompson, J., & Ribuffo, C. (2015). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities (CEEDAR Document No. IC-3). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Center. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
Brown, F., & Snell, M. E. (2000). Meaningful assessment. In F. Brown & M. E. Snell (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed., pp. 67–114). Pearson Education.
Brown, H. M., Oram-Cardy, J., & Johnson, A. (2013). A meta-analysis of the reading comprehension skills of individuals on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(4), 932–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1638-1
Bruce, S. M. (2011). Severe and multiple disabilities. In J. M. Kauffman & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of special education (1st ed., pp. 291–303). Routledge.
Bruce, S. M., & Ivy, S. E. (2017). Severe and multiple disabilities. In J. M. Kauffman, D. P. Hallahan, & P. C. Pullen (Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 411–427). Routledge.
Bruster, D. (2011). Who does the alternate assessment really assess? Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 2011(Spring-Summer), 33–40. http://aasep.org/aasep-publications/journal-of-the-american-academy-of-special-education-professionals-jaasep/index.html
- Bullington, N. Y. (2022). General education teachers’ attitudes, beliefs and perceptions on inclusive practices: A qualitative phenomenological study (Publication No. 29996801) [Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2742632085
- Bulut, O., Bulut, H. C., Cormier, D. C., Dibek, M. I., & Kursad, M. S. (2023). The effects of providing students with revision opportunities in alternate assessments. Educational Assessment, 28(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2022.2138322
Bulut, O., Lei, M., & Guo, Q. (2018). Item and testlet position effects in computer-based alternate assessments for students with disabilities. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1262341
Burdette, P. (2001). Alternate assessment: Early highlights and pitfalls of reporting. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770102600210
Burdette, P., & Olsen, K. (2000). Alternate alternates: A medley of alternate assessments. Mid-South Regional Resource Center (MSRRC), Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute, University of Kentucky. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED452642
Burdge, M., Groneck, V. B., Kleinert, H. L., Longwill, A. W., Clayton, J., Denham, A., & Kearns, J. F. (2001). Integrating alternate assessment in the general curriculum. In W. D. Schafer & R. W. Lissitz (Eds.), Alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards: Policy, practice, and potential (pp. 49–75). Paul H. Brookes.
Burling, K. (2007). The legislative history of alternate assessments: A white paper from Pearson Educational Measurement. Pearson Educational Measurement. http://www.pearsonassessments.com/NR/rdonlyres/24A75E10-0BF9-4B2C-8043-F324B541249B/0/wp0703.pdf