Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

909 results.

  • Hidi, S. E., & Hildyard, A. (1983). The comparison of oral and written productions in two discourse types. Discourse Processes, 6(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538309544557

    Detail

  • Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1995). Compensatory effectiveness of speech recognition on the written composition performance of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511202

    Detail

  • Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2005). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340502000103

    Detail

  • Higgins, J. A., Famularo, L., Cawthon, S. W., Kurz, C. A., Reis, J. E., & Moers, L. M. (2016). Development of American Sign Language guidelines for K–12 academic assessments. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21(4), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enw051

    Detail

  • Higgins, J., & Katz, M. (2013). A comparison of audio representations of mathematics content. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800305

    Detail

  • Higgins, J., Russell, M., & Hoffmann, T. (2005). Examining the effect of computer-based passage presentation on reading test performance. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(4). https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/issue/archive

    Detail
  • Hill, G. A. (1984). Learning disabled college students: The assessment of academic aptitude (Publication No. 555914) [Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303338414
    Detail

  • Hipkiss, A., Woods, K. A., & McCaldin, T. (2021). Students’ use of GCSE access arrangements. British Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12347

    Detail
  • Hiscox, L., Leonavičiute, E., & Humby, T. (2014). The effects of automatic spelling correction software on understanding and comprehension in compensated dyslexia: Improved recall following dictation. Dyslexia, 20(3), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1480
    Detail
  • Hodgson, J. R., Lazarus, S. S., Price, L. M., Altman, J. R., & Thurlow, M. L. (2012). Test administrators’ perspectives on the use of the read aloud accommodation in math on state tests for accountability (Technical Report No. 66). University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. https://nceo.info/Resources/publications/OnlinePubs/Tech66/default.htm
    Detail

  • Hollenbeck, K. (2005). Validity issues and decisions about testing accommodations. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770503100102

    Detail

  • Hollenbeck, K., Rozek-Tedesco, M. A., Tindal, G., & Glasgow, A. (2000). An exploratory study of student-paced versus teacher-paced accommodations for large-scale math tests. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500203

    Detail

  • Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G., & Almond, P. (1998). Teachers’ knowledge of accommodations as a validity issue in high-stakes testing. The Journal of Special Education, 32(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200304

    Detail

  • Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G., Harniss, M., & Almond, P. (1999). The effect of using computers as an accommodation in a statewide writing test. University of Oregon Research Consultation, and Teaching Program.

    Detail

  • Hollenbeck, K., Tindal, G., Stieber, S., & Harniss, M. (1999). Handwritten versus word-processed statewide compositions: Do judges rate them differently? University of Oregon Research Consultation, and Teaching Program.

    Detail

  • Holmes, A., & Silvestri, R. (2012). Assistive technology use by students with LD in postsecondary education: A case of application before investigation? Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573512437018

    Detail

  • Holmes, A., & Silvestri, R. (2019). Extra time or unused time? What data from a college testing center tells us about 50% extra time as an accommodation for students with learning disabilities. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09339-9

    Detail
  • Hong, N., Kim, J., Kwon, J.-H., Eom, H., & Kim, E. (2022). Effect of distractors on sustained attention and hyperactivity in youth with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder using a mobile virtual reality school program. Journal of Attention Disorders, 26(3), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720986229
    Detail

  • Horkay, N., Bennett, R. E., Allen, N., Kaplan, B., & Yan, F. (2006). Does it matter if I take my writing test on computer? An empirical study of mode effects in NAEP. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5(2). https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/issue/archive

    Detail
  • Horton, S. (1985). A study of the efficacy of teaching educable mentally retarded adolescents to solve subtraction problems with pencil and paper and calculators under several treatment conditions (Publication No. 8508059) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303314676
    Detail