Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

935 results.
  • Halla, J. W. (1988). A psychological study of psychometric differences in Graduate Record Examinations general test scores between learning disabled and non-learning disabled adults (Publication No. 8900941) [Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303710175
    Detail

  • Hamhuis, E., Glas, C., & Meelissen, M. (2020). Tablet assessment in primary education: Are there performance differences between TIMSS’ paper-and-pencil test and tablet test among Dutch grade-four students? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2340–2358. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12914

    Detail

  • Hansen, E. G., Lee, M. J., & Forer, D. C. (2002). A “self-voicing” test for individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(4), 273–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0209600409

    Detail

  • Hansen, E. G., Liu, L., Rogat, A., & Hakkinen, M. T. (2016). Designing innovative science assessments that are accessible for students who are blind. Journal of Blindness Innovation and Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5241/6-91

    Detail

  • Hansen, E. G., Loew, R. C., Laitusis, C. C., Kushalnagar, P., Pagliaro, C. M., & Kurz, C. (2018). Usability of American Sign Language videos for presenting mathematics assessment content. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 23(3), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eny008

    Detail

  • Hansen, E. G., Mislevy, R. J., & Steinberg, L. S. (2008). Evidence-centered assessment design for reasoning about accommodations for individuals with disabilities in NAEP reading and mathematics (ETS Research Report No. RR-08-38). ETS. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02124.x

    Detail

  • Hanson, K., Brown, B., Levine, R., & Garcia, T. (2001). Should standard calculators be provided in testing situations? An investigation of performance and preference differences. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1401_05

    Detail

  • Hanson, M., Hayes, J., Schriver, K., LeMahieu, P. G., & Brown, P. J. (1998). A plain language approach to the revision of test items. University of Delaware Education Research and Development Center.

    Detail

  • Harker, J. K., & Feldt, L. S. (1993). A comparison of achievement test performance of nondisabled students under silent reading and reading plus listening modes of administration. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0604_4

    Detail
  • Harris, C. (2024). Faculty beliefs toward academic accommodations for prelicensure nursing students with disabilities (Publication No. 31240747) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/3054377900
    Detail
  • Harris, G. S. (1992). Assessing problem-solving skills on selected questions from the Scholastic Aptitude Test (Publication No. 9231377) [Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303997387
    Detail
  • Harris, L. W. S. (2008). Comparison of student performance between teacher read and CD-ROM delivered modes of test administration of English language arts tests (Publication No. 3321402) [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304458812
    Detail
  • Harrison, A. G., & Armstrong, I. (2022). Accommodation decision-making for postsecondary students with ADHD: Treating the able as disabled. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09461-1
    Detail
  • Harrison, A. G., Pollock, B., & Holmes, A. (2022). Provision of extended assessment time in post-secondary settings: A review of the literature and proposed guidelines for practice. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09451-3
    Detail

  • Hasselbring, T. S., & Crossland, C. L. (1982). Application of microcomputer technology to spelling assessment of learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5(1), 80–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510620

    Detail
  • Hawpe, J. C. (2013). Secondary teachers’ attitudes toward and willingness to provide accommodations and modifications for students with disabilities (Publication No. 3538967) [Doctoral dissertation, Baker University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1328120165
    Detail

  • Haydon, T., Hawkins, R., Derune, H., Kimener, H., McCoy, D., & Basham, J. (2012). A comparison of iPads and worksheets on math skills of high school students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 37(4), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203700404

    Detail

  • Haynes, L. T., & Cole, N. S. (1982, April). Testing some assumptions about on-level versus out-of-level achievement testing. Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), New York, NY, United States.

    Detail

  • Helwig, R., & Tindal, G. (2003). An experimental analysis of accommodation decisions on large-scale mathematics tests. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290306900206

    Detail

  • Helwig, R., Rozek-Tedesco, M. A., & Tindal, G. (2002). An oral versus a standard administration of a large-scale mathematics test. The Journal of Special Education, 36(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669020360010401

    Detail