Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

935 results.
  • Ganguly, R. (2010). Testing accommodations for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A national survey of special education teachers (Publication No. 3430863) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/787893086
    Detail
  • Gardner, T. J. (2008). Speech recognition for students with disabilities in writing. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 26(2), 43–53. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/pders

    Detail
  • Garrett, J. T., Heller, K. W., Fowler, L. P., Alberto, P. A., Fredrick, L. D., & O’Rourke, C. M. (2011). Using speech recognition software to increase writing fluency for individuals with physical disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341102600104

    Detail
  • Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Psychometric issues in testing students with disabilities. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0702_2

    Detail
  • Gelbar, N., & Madaus, J. (2021). Factors related to extended time use by college students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 42(6), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520972787

    Detail
  • George-Ezzelle, C. E., & Skaggs, G. (2004, April). Examining the validity of GED tests scores with scheduling and setting accommodations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), San Diego, CA. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED510061

    Detail
  • Gibson, D., Haeberli, F. B., Glover, T. A., & Witter, E. A. (2003). The use of recommended and provided testing accommodations (WCER Working Paper No. 2003–8). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. https://wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers

    Detail
  • Gibson, D., Haeberlie, F. B., Glover, T. A., & Witter, E. A. (2005). Use of recommended and provided testing accommodations I. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770503100103

    Detail
  • Gilbert, K., Kranzler, J., & Benson, N. (2021). An independent examination of the equivalence of the standard and digital administration formats of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-5th Edition. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.01.002

    Detail
  • Gin, L. E. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for students with disabilities in evolving learning environments: Active learning, online instruction, and undergraduate research (Publication No. 28862023) [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2616380174
    Detail
  • Giusto, M. (2015). Effectiveness of a partial read-aloud test accommodation to assess reading comprehension in students with a reading disability (Publication No. 3729013) [Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1727740182
    Detail
  • Giusto, M., & Ehri, L. C. (2019). Effectiveness of a partial read-aloud test accommodation to assess reading comprehension in students with a reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418789377

    Detail
  • Goegan, L. D., Le, L., Rioux, B. P., & Daniels, L. M. (2019). Examining factors that support continued use of assistive technology by postsecondary students with disabilities. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 10(1), 28–41. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse

    Detail
  • Golan, M., Singer, G., Rabin, N., & Kleper, D. (2020). Integrating actual time usage into the assessment of examination time extensions provided to disabled college engineering students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 988–1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1717434
    Detail
  • Golden, C. K. (1982). The effect of the hand-held calculator on mathematics speed, accuracy, and motivation of secondary educable mentally retarded students (grades 7-9) (Publication No. 8226927) [Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303083651
    Detail
  • Goodrich, G. L., Bennet, R. R., & Wiley, J. K. (1977). Electronic calculators for visually impaired users: An evaluation. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 71(4), 154–157. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jvb
    Detail
  • Goodwin, A. P., Cho, S. J., Reynolds, D., Brady, K., & Salas, J. (2020). Digital versus paper reading processes and links to comprehension for middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 57(4), 1837–1867. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219890300

    Detail
  • Gormley, M. J., DuPaul, G. J., Weyandt, L. L., & Anastopoulos, A. D. (2019). First-year GPA and academic service use among college students with and without ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 23(14), 1766–1779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054715623046

    Detail
  • Gould, R., Heider, A., Harris, S. P., Jones, R., Peters, J., Eisenberg, Y., & Caldwell, K. (2022). Self-determination and quality indicators for assistive technology in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 35(1), 45–60. https://www.ahead.org/publications/jped
    Detail
  • Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students’ compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.781

    Detail