Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

935 results.

  • Perlman, C., Borger, J., Collins, C., Elenbogen, J., & Wood, J. (1996, April). The effect of extended time limits on learning disabled students’ scores on standardized reading tests [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), New York, NY, United States. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED400316

    Detail
  • Peterson, D. H. (2017). Parental and teacher perspectives on assistive technology (Publication No. 10600110) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1960809140
    Detail
  • Peterson, M. C. (2016). Assistive technology management by disabilities services managers in higher education: A phenomenological study (Publication No. 10127838) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1810157903
    Detail
  • Phillips, A., Terras, K., Swinney, L., & Schneweis, C. (2012). Online disability accommodations: Faculty experiences at one public university. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25(4), 331–344. https://www.ahead.org/professional-resources/publications/jped
    Detail
  • Pitoniak, M., & Royer, J. (2001). Testing accommodations for examinees with disabilities: A review of psychometric, legal, and social policy issues. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 53–104. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001053
    Detail

  • Poggio, J., Glasnapp, D. R., Yang, X., & Poggio, A. J. (2005). A comparative evaluation of score results from computerized and paper & pencil mathematics testing in a large scale state assessment program. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(6). https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1659

    Detail
  • Polkowski, S. M. (2017). An analysis of educator practices: Learning and assessment accommodations for students with special needs (Publication No. 10757827) [Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1994114164
    Detail

  • Pommerich, M. (2004). Developing computerized versions of paper-and-pencil tests: Mode effects for passage-based tests. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(6). https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla

    Detail

  • Pomplun, M., & Omar, M. H. (2000). Score comparability of a state mathematics assessment across students with and without reading accommodations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.21

    Detail

  • Pomplun, M., Frey, S., & Becker, D. (2002). The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402062002009

    Detail

  • Posey, V., & Henderson, B. (2012). Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment Systems braille reading assessment: An exploratory study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(8), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1210600805

    Detail

  • Potter, K., Lewandowski, L., & Spenceley, L. (2016). The influence of a response format test accommodation for college students with and without disabilities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052368

    Detail
  • Poudel, B. B. (2014). Acceptance and use of assistive technology: Perspectives of high school and college students with high-incidence disabilities (Publication No. 3685130) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1661456491
    Detail

  • Powers, D. E., & Fowles, M. E. (1996). Effects of applying different time limits to a proposed GRE writing test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00500.x

    Detail

  • Powers, D. E., Fowles, M. E., Farnum, M., & Ramsey, P. (1994). Will they think less of my handwritten essay if others word process theirs? Effects on essay scores of intermingling handwritten and word-processed essays. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00444.x

    Detail
  • Price, K. N. (2018). STEM and non-STEM faculty knowledge and attitudes toward students with disabilities (Publication No. 10816493) [Doctoral dissertation, Barry University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2057991694
    Detail
  • Price-Mohr, R. M., & Price, C. B. (2024). Increasing inter-word spacing reduces migration errors and improves reading comprehension in students with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 30(4), e1787. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1787
    Detail
  • Prisacari, A. A., & Danielson, J. (2017). Computer-based versus paper-based testing: Investigating testing mode with cognitive load and scratch paper use. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.044
    Detail
  • Prisacari, A. A., & Danielson, J. (2017). Rethinking testing mode: Should I offer my next chemistry test on paper or computer? Computers & Education, 106, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.008
    Detail
  • Pritchard, A. E., Koriakin, T., Carey, L., Bellows, A., Jacobson, L., & Mahone, E. (2016). Academic testing accommodations for ADHD: Do they help? Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 67–78. https://ldaamerica.org/info/learning-disabilities-a-multidisciplinary-journal/
    Detail