Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

827 results.

  • Bouck, E. C. (2009). Calculating the value of graphing calculators for seventh-grade students with and without disabilities: A pilot study. Remedial and Special Education, 30(4), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508321010

    Detail

  • Bouck, E. C., & Bouck, M. K. (2008). Does it add up? Calculators as accommodations for sixth grade students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(2), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340802300202

    Detail

  • Bouck, E. C., & Long, H. (2021). Assistive technology for students with disabilities: An updated snapshot. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(4), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420914624

    Detail

  • Bouck, E. C., & Yadav, A. (2008). Assessing calculators as assessment accommodations for students with disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 5(1), 19–28. https://www.atia.org/at-resources/atob/

    Detail

  • Bouck, E. C., Bouck, M. K., & Hunley, M. (2015). The calculator effect: Understanding the impact of calculators as accommodations for secondary students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415617371

    Detail

  • Bouck, E. C., Flanagan, S., & Joshi, G. S. (2011). Speaking math—A voice input, speech output calculator for students with visual impairments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341102600401

    Detail

  • Bouck, E. C., Joshi, G. S., & Johnson, L. (2013). Examining calculator use among students with and without disabilities educated with different mathematical curricula. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9461-3

    Detail

  • Bouck, E., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., Park, J., & Whorley, A. (2018). Adding it up: Comparing concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with adding fractions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(3), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418759341

    Detail

  • Bourke, A. B., Strehorn, K. C., & Silver, P. (2000). Faculty members’ provision of instructional accommodations to students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300106

    Detail

  • Brackenreed, D. G. (2006). English teachers’ perceptions of standards tests, the efficacy of testing accommodations and appropriateness for students with special needs (Publication No. NR20280) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Regina (Canada)]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail

  • Bradley-Johnson, S., Graham, D. P., & Johnson, C. M. (1986). Token reinforcement on WISC-R performance for white, low-socioeconomic, upper and lower elementary-school-age students. Journal of School Psychology, 24(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(86)90044-0

    Detail

  • Bradley-Johnson, S., Johnson, C. M., Shanahan, R., Rickert, V. I., & Tardona, D. R. (1984). Effects of token reinforcement on WISC-R performance of Black and White, low socioeconomic second graders. Behavioral Assessment, 6(4), 365–373. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1985-21459-001

    Detail
  • Brady, K. K., Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K. S., Ainsworth, M. K., & Gafurov, B. S. (2022). Using a technology-based graphic organizer to improve the planning and persuasive paragraph writing by adolescents with disabilities and writing difficulties. The Journal of Special Education, 55(4), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669211008256
    Detail

  • Braun, H., Ragosta, M., & Kaplan, B. (1986). The predictive validity of the Scholastic Aptitude Test for disabled students (ETS Research Report No. RR-86-38). College Board.

    Detail

  • Braun, S. L. M. (2017). The impact of disability services knowledge, perspectives, and experience of testing center staff on provided accommodations at community colleges (Publication No. 10634524) [Doctoral dissertation, University of St. Francis]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail

  • Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., & Hessinger, J. (2004). Effect of extra time on verbal and quantitative GRE scores. Applied Measurement in Education, 17(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1701_2

    Detail

  • Bridgeman, B., Harvey, A., & Braswell, J. (1995). Effects of calculator use on scores on a test of mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00470.x

    Detail

  • Bridgeman, B., Lennon, M. L., & Jackenthal, A. (2003). Effects of screen size, screen resolution and display rate on computer-based test performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1603_2

    Detail

  • Bridgeman, B., Trapani, C., & Curley, E. (2004). Impact of fewer questions per section on SAT I scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41(4), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01167.x

    Detail

  • Brockelmann, K. (2011). Faculty members’ ratings of the effectiveness of academic strategies for university students with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 43–52. https://www.ahead.org/publications/jped

    Detail