Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

827 results.

  • Barnhill, G. P. (2016). Supporting students with Asperger Syndrome on college campuses: Current practices. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 31(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614523121

    Detail

  • Barton, K. E. (2002, April). A standard versus orally accommodated reading assessment for students with and without disabilities: An investigation of construct stability [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA, United States.

    Detail

  • Barton, K. E. W. (2001). Stability of constructs across groups of students with different disabilities on a reading assessment under standard and accommodated administrations (Publication No. 3036177) [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail

  • Barton, K. E., & Huynh, H. (2000, April). Patterns of errors made on a reading test with oral reading administration. Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), New Orleans, LA, United States.

    Detail

  • Barton, K. E., & Huynh, H. (2003). Patterns of errors made by students with disabilities on a reading test with oral reading administration. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403256363

    Detail

  • Barton, K. E., Sheinker, A., Edelblut, P., Elliot, S., & Mikulas, C. (2003, April). Comparability and accessibility: On line versus on paper writing prompt administration and scoring across students with various abilities [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL, United States.

    Detail

  • Batho, L. P., Martinussen, R., & Wiener, J. (2020). The effects of different types of environmental noise on academic performance and perceived task difficulty in adolescents with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(8), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054715594421

    Detail

  • Baxter, B. (1941). An experimental analysis of the contributions of speed and level in an intelligence test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32(4), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061115

    Detail

  • Bayles, M. (2009). Perceptions of educators and parents of the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) requirement for students with disabilities (Publication No. 3397119) [Doctoral dissertation, California Lutheran University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail

  • Beal, C. R., & Rosenblum, L. P. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tablet computer application (app) in helping students with visual impairments solve mathematics problems. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200102

    Detail

  • Beattie, S. (1982). The effect of physical test format modifications on the performance of third grade mildly handicapped and normal students (Publication No. 8302206) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail

  • Beattie, S., Grise, P., & Algozzine, B. (1983). Effects of test modifications on the minimum competency performance of learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6(1), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510869

    Detail

  • Becker, S., & Palladino, J. (2016). Assessing faculty perspectives about teaching and working with students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(1), 65–82. https://www.ahead.org/publications/jped

    Detail

  • Beddow, P. A. (2011). Effects of testing accommodations and item modifications on students’ performance: An experimental investigation of test accessibility strategies (Publication No. 3479839) [Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02092011-230046/unrestricted/Beddow.pdf

    Detail

  • Bennett, R. E., Braswell, J., Oranje, A., Sandene, B., Kaplan, B., & Yan, F. (2008). Does it matter if I take my mathematics test on computer? A second empirical study of mode effects in NAEP. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(9). http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1639/1472

    Detail

  • Bennett, R. E., Rock, D. A., & Jirele, T. (1987). GRE score level, test completion, and reliability for visually impaired, physically handicapped, and non handicapped groups. The Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698702100303

    Detail

  • Bennett, R. E., Rock, D. A., & Kaplan, B. A. (1987). SAT differential item performance for nine handicapped groups. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00260.x

    Detail

  • Bennett, R. E., Rock, D. A., & Novatkoski, I. (1989). Differential item functioning on the SAT-M Braille edition. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1989.tb00319.x

    Detail

  • Berger, C., & Lewandowski, L. (2013). The effect of a word processor as an accommodation for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Writing Research, 4(3), 300–318. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.04.03.2

    Detail

  • Bettencourt, G. M., Kimball, E., & Wells, R. S. (2018). Disability in postsecondary STEM learning environments: What faculty focus groups reveal about definitions and obstacles to effective support. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 31(4), 383–396. http://www.ahead.org/publications/jped

    Detail