Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Results

770 results.
  • Barton, K. E., Sheinker, A., Edelblut, P., Elliot, S., & Mikulas, C. (2003). Comparability and accessibility: On line versus on paper writing prompt administration and scoring across students with various abilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.

    Detail
  • Batho, L. P., Martinussen, R., & Wiener, J. (2020). The effects of different types of environmental noise on academic performance and perceived task difficulty in adolescents with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(8), 1181–1191. doi:10.1177/1087054715594421

    Detail
  • Baxter, B. (1941). An experimental analysis of the contributions of speed and level in an intelligence test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32(4), 285–296. doi:10.1037/h0061115

    Detail
  • Bayles, M. (2009). Perceptions of educators and parents of the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) requirement for students with disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 71(04). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/89255969/abstract

    Detail
  • Beal, C. R., & Rosenblum, L. P. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tablet computer application (app) in helping students with visual impairments solve mathematics problems. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 5–19. doi:10.1177/0145482X1811200102

    Detail
  • Beattie, S. (1982). The effect of physical test format modifications on the performance of third grade mildly handicapped and normal students. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 43(09). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/303237633/abstract

    Detail
  • Beattie, S., Grise, P., & Algozzine, B. (1983). Effects of test modifications on the minimum competency performance of learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6(1), 75–77. doi:10.2307/1510869

    Detail
  • Becker, S., & Palladino, J. (2016). Assessing faculty perspectives about teaching and working with students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(1), 65–82. Retrieved from https://www.ahead.org/publications/jped

    Detail
  • Beddow, P. A. (2011). Effects of testing accommodations and item modifications on students’ performance: An experimental investigation of test accessibility strategies. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 72(12). Retrieved from http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02092011-230046/unrestricted/Beddow.pdf

    Detail
  • Bennett, R. E., Braswell, J., Oranje, A., Sandene, B., Kaplan, B., & Yan, F. (2008). Does it matter if I take my mathematics test on computer? A second empirical study of mode effects in NAEP. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(9). Retrieved from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1639/1472

    Detail
  • Bennett, R. E., Rock, D. A., & Jirele, T. (1987). GRE score level, test completion, and reliability for visually impaired, physically handicapped, and non handicapped groups. The Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 9–21. doi:10.1177/002246698702100303

    Detail
  • Bennett, R. E., Rock, D. A., & Kaplan, B. A. (1987). SAT differential item performance for nine handicapped groups. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(1), 41–55. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00260.x

    Detail
  • Bennett, R. E., Rock, D. A., & Novatkoski, I. (1989). Differential item functioning on the SAT-M Braille edition. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(1), 67–79. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1989.tb00319.x

    Detail
  • Berger, C., & Lewandowski, L. (2013). The effect of a word processor as an accommodation for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Writing Research, 4(3), 300–318. doi:10.17239/jowr-2013.04.03.2

    Detail
  • Bettencourt, G. M., Kimball, E., & Wells, R. S. (2018). Disability in postsecondary STEM learning environments: What faculty focus groups reveal about definitions and obstacles to effective support. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 31(4), 383–396. Retrieved from http://www.ahead.org/publications/jped

    Detail
  • Bielinski, J., Sheinker, A., & Ysseldyke, J. (2003). Varied opinions on how to report accommodated test scores: Findings based on CTB/McGraw-Hill’s framework for classifying accomodations (Synthesis Report #49). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis49.html

    Detail
  • Bielinski, J., Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., Freidebach, J., & Freidebach, M. (2001). Read-aloud accommodations: Effects on multiple-choice reading and math items (Technical Report No. 31). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.cehd.umn.edu/nceo/OnlinePubs/Technical31.htm

    Detail
  • Bishop-Temple, C. (2007). The effects of interactive read-alouds on the reading achievement of middle grade reading students in a core remedial program. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(10). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304848275/abstract

    Detail
  • Blanding, K. M., Richards, J., Bradley-Johnson, S., & Johnson, M. J. (1994). The effect of token reinforcement on McCarthy Scale performance for white preschoolers of low and high social position. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4(1), 33–39. doi:10.1007/BF01560507

    Detail
  • Blaskey, P., Scheiman, M., Parisi, M., Ciner, E. B., Gallaway, M., & Selznick, R. (1990). The effectiveness of Irlen Filters for improving reading performance: A pilot study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(10), 604–612. doi:10.1177/002221949002301007

    Detail