Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

912 results.

  • Allinder, R. M., & Eccarius, M. A. (1999). Exploring the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in reading for children who use manually coded English. Exceptional Children, 65(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299906500210

    Detail

  • Alster, E. H. (1997). The effects of extended time on algebra test scores for college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000210

    Detail

  • Alt, M., & Moreno, M. H. (2012). The effect of test presentation on children with autism spectrum disorders and neurotypical peers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0092)

    Detail
  • Altman, J. R., Cormier, D. C., Lazarus, S. S., Thurlow, M. L., Holbrook, M., Byers, M., Chambers, D., Moore, M., & Pence, N. (2010). Accommodations: Results of a survey of Alabama special education teachers (Synthesis Report No. 81). University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. https://nceo.info/Resources/publications/OnlinePubs/Synthesis81/default.htm
    Detail

  • Anderson, A. H., Carter, M., & Stephenson, J. (2018). Perspectives of university students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(3), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3257-3

    Detail
  • Anderson, T. A. (2023). Jamaican college administrators’ perceptions of providing accommodations for students with disabilities (Publication No. 30687890) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2867948314
    Detail
  • Andreou, G., Athanasiadou, P., & Tzivinikou, S. (2019). Accommodations on reading comprehension assessment for students with learning disabilities: A review study. Psychology, 10(4), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.104034
    Detail
  • Anjorin, I. (2009). High-stakes tests for students with specific learning disabilities: Disability-based differential item functioning (Publication No. 3390841) [Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304997473
    Detail

  • Ansell, E., & Pagliaro, C. (2006). The relative difficulty of signed arithmetic story problems for primary level deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enj030

    Detail
  • Antalek, E. E. (2005). The relationships between specific learning disability attributes and written language: A study of the performance of learning disabled high school subjects completing the TOWL-3 (Publication No. 3154958) [Doctoral dissertation, Clark University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/305006698
    Detail

  • Arce-Ferrer, A. J., & Guzman, E. M. (2009). Studying the equivalence of computer-delivered and paper-based administrations of the Raven standard progressive matrices test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(5), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409332219

    Detail
  • Armour, C. D. (2023). Reimagining inclusion in higher education: Learning from the experiences of U.S. students with dis/abilities before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (Publication No. 30425620) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2833472085
    Detail

  • Arnold, V., Legas, J., Obler, S., Pacheco, M. A., Russell, C., & Umbdenstock, L. (1990). Do students get higher scores on their word-processed papers? A study of bias in scoring hand-written vs. word-processed papers (pp. 1–33). Rio Hondo College. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/24/0e/0d.pdf

    Detail
  • Atchison, B. T. (2008). Assistive technology as an accommodation on accountability assessments: An analysis of attitudes and knowledge of special education professionals (Publication No. 3310867) [Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304561104
    Detail

  • Ayllon, T., & Kelly, K. (1972). Effects of reinforcement on standardized test performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(4), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1972.5-477

    Detail

  • Ayrer, J. E., & McNamara, T. C. (1973). Survey testing on an out-of-level basis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1973.tb00785.x

    Detail

  • Bachor, D. G. (1979). Suggestions for modifications in testing low-achieving adolescents. The Journal of Special Education, 13(4), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246697901300411

    Detail
  • Baker, J. S. (2005). Effect of extended time testing accommodations on grade point averages of college students with learning disabilities (Publication No. 3205714) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304908732
    Detail
  • Baker, T. T. (2021). Support for students with disabilities: How awareness and accommodations differ across faculty members within the postsecondary context (Publication No. 28539983) [Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/28539983
    Detail
  • Banks, J. (2019). Are we ready: Faculty perceptions of postsecondary students with learning disabilities at a historically Black university. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(4), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000100
    Detail