Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

935 results.

  • Morphy, P., & Graham, S. (2012). Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5

    Detail
  • Morris, C. (1988). Effects of group size and examiner familiarity on the standardized achievement test performance of junior high school remedial readers (Publication No. 9000751) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Miami]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303706642
    Detail
  • Mowl, H. M., Jr. (1985). Performance of deaf students on a standard and modified minimum competency test (Publication No. 8601420) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303398077
    Detail
  • Mulcahy, C. A., Camacho, K. A., & Fenty, N. S. (2024). A systematic review of research on technology use among students with high incidence disabilities. Exceptionality, 32(3), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2023.2285272
    Detail
  • Mull, C., Sitlington, P. L., & Alper, S. (2001). Postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106800106
    Detail

  • Munger, G. F., & Loyd, B. H. (1991). Effect of speededness on test performance of handicapped and nonhandicapped examinees. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1991.10702812

    Detail

  • Munson, S. M. (1987). Regular education teacher modifications for mainstreamed mildly handicapped students. The Journal of Special Education, 20(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698602000409

    Detail
  • Murders, M. (2017). A phenomenological study of the online education experiences of college students with learning disabilities (Publication No. 10635327) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1964264271
    Detail
  • Murray, A., & Sotardi, V. (2022). Exploring experiences and academic outcomes of first-year university students with and without perceived disabilities or impairments. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(5), 1678–1693. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1811842
    Detail
  • Murray, C., Flannery, B. K., & Wren, C. (2008). University staff members’ attitudes and knowledge about learning disabilities and disability support services. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21(2), 73–90. https://www.ahead.org/publications/jped
    Detail
  • Murray, C., Wren, C. T., & Keys, C. (2008). University faculty perceptions of students with learning disabilities: Correlates and group differences. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(3), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/25474642
    Detail
  • Murray, E. A. (1987). The relationship between spatial abilities and mathematics achievement in normal and learning disabled boys (Publication No. 8724729) [Doctoral dissertation, Boston University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/303564422
    Detail
  • Murray, L. C. (2017). College in mind: A mixed-methods study of how emerging adults with psychiatric disabilities prepare for and transition to and through higher education (Publication No. 10274191) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1940234789
    Detail
  • Muthukumaran, A. (2023). Experiences of middle school students with visual impairments accessing technologies in inclusive classrooms (Publication No. 30573660) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2854805314
    Detail

  • Myers, C. T. (1952). The factorial composition and validity of differently speeded tests. Psychometrika, 17(3), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288766

    Detail
  • Nail, E. L. (2023). Postsecondary students with disabilities: Perspectives from the disability office (Publication No. 30319012) [Doctoral dissertation, Robert Morris University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2799341601
    Detail

  • Nees, M. A., & Berry, L. F. (2013). Audio assistive technology and accommodations for students with visual impairments: Potentials and problems for delivering curricula and educational assessments. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2(3), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.016

    Detail
  • Nelson, J. R., Dodd, J. M., & Smith, D. J. (1990). Faculty willingness to accommodate students with learning disabilities: A comparison among academic divisions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(3), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949002300309
    Detail

  • Nelson, J. S., Jayanthi, M., Epstein, , Bursuck, M. H., & William, D. (2000). Student preferences for adaptations in classroom testing. Remedial and Special Education, 21(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100106

    Detail
  • Nelson, L. M., & Reynolds, T. W. (2015). Speech recognition, disability, and college composition. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 181–197. https://www.ahead.org/professional-resources/publications/jped
    Detail