Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

935 results.

  • Keenan, W. R., Madaus, J. W., Lombardi, A. R., & Dukes, L. L., III. (2019). Impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act on documentation for students with disabilities in transition to college: Implications for practitioners. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418809691

    Detail

  • Keene, S., & Davey, B. (1987). Effects of computer-presented text on LD adolescents’ reading behaviors. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(4), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510602

    Detail
  • Kelley, T. L. (2022). A phenomenological investigation of student, parent, and teacher perceptions of a school districts dyslexia program (Publication No. 28968540) [Doctoral dissertation, Tarleton State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2674758562
    Detail
  • Kelly, K. R., Jost, R. M., De La Cruz, A., & Birch, E. E. (2018). Multiple-choice answer form completion time in children with amblyopia and strabismus. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Ophthalmology, 136(8), 938–941. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2295
    Detail

  • Kelly, S. M. (2009). Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(8), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0910300805

    Detail
  • Kelly, S. M., & Smith, D. W. (2011). The impact of assistive technology on the educational performance of students with visual impairments: A synthesis of the research. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(2), 73–83. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jvb
    Detail

  • Keng, L., McClarty, K. L., & Davis, L. L. (2008). Item-level comparative analysis of online and paper administrations of the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957340802161774

    Detail

  • Kern, L., Hetrick, A. A., Custer, B. A., & Commisso, C. E. (2019). An evaluation of IEP accommodations for secondary students with emotional and behavioral problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426618763108

    Detail
  • Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Alonzo, J., Braun-Monegan, J., & Tindal, G. (2007). Recommendations for accommodations: Implications of (in)consistency. Remedial and Special Education, 28(4), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280040101
    Detail

  • Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Crawford, L., & Huscroft-D’Angelo, J. N. (2014). Screening to assign accommodations: Using data to make decisions. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I2-5277

    Detail

  • Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Yovanoff, P., & Tindal, G. (2007). Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300304

    Detail

  • Kettler, R. J. (2015). Adaptations and access to assessment of Common Core content. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 295–330. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X14556075

    Detail

  • Kettler, R. J., Dickenson, T. S., Bennett, H. L., Morgan, G. B., Gilmore, J. A., Beddow, P. A., Swaffield, S., Turner, L., Herrera, B., Turner, C., & Palmer, P. W. (2012). Enhancing the accessibility of high school science tests: A multistate experiment. Exceptional Children, 79(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207900105

    Detail

  • Kettler, R. J., Niebling, B. C., Mroch, A. A., Feldman, E. S., & Newell, M. L. (2003). Effects of testing accommodations on math and reading scores: An experimental analysis of the performance of fourth and eighth grade students with and without disabilities (WCER Working Paper No. 2003–7). Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison. https://wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers

    Detail

  • Kettler, R. J., Niebling, B. C., Mroch, A. A., Feldman, E. S., Newell, M. L., Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., & Bolt, D. M. (2005). Effects of testing accommodations on math and reading scores: An experimental analysis of the performance of students with and without disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770503100104

    Detail

  • Kettler, R. J., Rodriguez, M. C., Bolt, D. M., Elliott, S. N., Beddow, P. A., & Kurz, A. (2011). Modified multiple-choice items for alternate assessments: Reliability, difficulty, and differential boost. Applied Measurement in Education, 24(3), 210–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2011.580620

    Detail

  • Khouri, M., Lipka, O., & Shecter-Lerner, M. (2022). University faculty perceptions about accommodations for students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1658812

    Detail
  • Kim, A. A., Yumsek, M., Kemp, J. A., Chapman, M., & Cook, H. G. (2023). Universal tools activation in English language proficiency assessments: A comparison of Grades 1–12 English learners with and without disabilities. Language Testing, 40(4), 877–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221149009
    Detail

  • Kim, D. H., & Huynh, H. (2008). Computer-based and paper-and-pencil administration mode effects on a statewide end-of-course English test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407310132

    Detail

  • Kim, D. H., & Huynh, H. (2010). Equivalence of paper-and-pencil and online administration modes of the statewide English test for students with and without disabilities. Educational Assessment, 15(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.491066

    Detail