Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Bibliography: Database

Search Filters

Keywords
% of Sample with Disability
Intended audience
Data collection instrument(s)
Technique(s) used in data analysis

Search Results

817 results.
  • Watts-Driscoll, A. (2007). The read aloud assessment accommodation for special education students in the United States (Publication No. 3279047) [Doctoral dissertation, Tennessee State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail
  • Weaver, S. M. (1993). The validity of the use of extended and untimed testing for postsecondary students with learning disabilities (Publication No. NN86341) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail
  • Weaver, S. M. (2000). The efficacy of extended time on tests for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 47–56. https://js.sagamorepub.com/ldmj/

    Detail
  • Weber, M. L., Welch, C. E., Parsons, J. T., & McLeod, T. C. V. (2015). School nurses’ familiarity and perceptions of academic accommodations for student-athletes following sport-related concussion. The Journal of School Nursing, 31(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840514540939

    Detail
  • Weis, R., & Beauchemin, E. L. (2020). Are separate room test accommodations effective for college students with disabilities? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1702922
    Detail
  • Weis, R., Dean, E. L., & Osborne, K. J. (2016). Accommodation decision making for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: Individually tailored or one size fits all? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414559648

    Detail
  • Weston, T. (2002). The validity of oral accommodation in testing. NAEP Validity Studies Panel. http://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/weston_finalrevpdf_0.pdf

    Detail
  • Weston, T. J. (1999). Investigating the validity of the accommodation of oral presentation in testing (Publication No. 9925457) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail
  • Weston, T. J. (2003). The validity of oral accommodation in testing: NAEP Validity Studies. National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/200306.pdf

    Detail
  • Wetzel, R., & Knowlton, M. (2000). A comparison of print and Braille reading rates on three reading tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0009400303

    Detail
  • Wheeler, L. J., & McNutt, G. (1983). The effect of syntax on low-achieving students’ abilities to solve mathematical word problems. The Journal of Special Education, 17(3), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698301700307

    Detail
  • Wheeler, P. H. (1995). Functional-level testing: A must for valid and accurate assessment results. EREAPA Associates.

    Detail
  • White, W. (1998). Research report on the use and effectiveness of accommodations for adults with disabilities in adult education centers. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Kansas State University.

    Detail
  • Wick, J. W. (1983). Reducing proportion of chance scores in inner-city standardized testing results: Impact on average scores. American Educational Research Journal, 20(3), 461–463. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312020003461

    Detail
  • Williams, A. D. (2015). Middle school students’ experience of receiving test accommodations (Publication No. 3713969) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    Detail
  • Willis, J., & Shibata, B. (1978). A comparison of tangible reinforcement and feedback effects on the WPPSI I.Q. scores of nursery school children. Education & Treatment of Children, 1(2), 31–45. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1980-06444-001

    Detail
  • Wise, S. L., & Wise, L. A. (1987). Comparison of computer-administered and paper-administered achievement tests with elementary school children. Computers in Human Behavior, 3(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(87)90006-9

    Detail
  • Wise, S. L., Kuhfeld, M. R., & Soland, J. (2019). The effects of effort monitoring with proctor notification on test-taking engagement, test performance, and validity. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2019.1577248

    Detail
  • Witmer, S. E., & Roschmann, S. (2020). An examination of measurement comparability for a school accountability test among accommodated and non-accommodated students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(2), 173–184. http://www.daddcec.com/etadd.html

    Detail
  • Witmer, S. E., & Roschmann, S. (2020). Exploring measurement comparability of accommodated math tests for students with emotional impairments. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 53(4), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2020.1735205

    Detail